Tuesday, June 3, 2008

What the New Testament Says about Homosexuality

Here's a great short article about the New Testament's perspective on homosexuality. There isn't anything radically new, it is just a great, succint presentation. With all of the press about the upcoming conference in Lambeth, Bishop Robinson's visit and the move to bless same-sex unions, I'm sure there are people who are wrestling with how Christians can accept homosexuality. Here's a good answer:


What the New Testament Says about Homosexuality
from The Fourth
R
21,3 (May-June 2008)
William O. Walker,
Jr.


Mainline Christian denominations in this country are bitterly divided over the question of homosexuality. For this reason it is important to ask what light, if any, the New Testament sheds on this controversial issue. Most people apparently assume that the New Testament expresses strong opposition to homosexuality, but this simply is not the case. The six propositions that follow, considered cumulatively, lead to the conclusion that the New Testament does not provide any direct guidance for understanding and making judgments about homosexuality in the modern world.

Proposition 1: Strictly speaking, the New Testament says nothing at all about homosexuality.

There is not a single Greek word or phrase in the entire New Testament that should be translated into English as “homosexual” or “homosexuality.” In fact, the very notion of “homosexuality”—like that of “heterosexuality,” “bisexuality,” and even “sexual orientation”—is essentially a modern concept that would simply have been unintelligible to the New Testament writers. The word “homosexuality” came into use only in the latter part of the nineteenth century, and, as New Testament scholar Victor Paul Furnish notes, it and related terms “presume an understanding of human sexuality that was possible only with the advent of modern psychological and sociological analysis.” In other words, “The ancient writers . . . were operating without the vaguest conception of what we have learned to call ‘sexual orientation’.”1 (In the rest of this article I shall use the terms “homosexual” and “homosexuality” strictly for the sake of convenience.)

You can read the rest HERE.

2 comments:

John Leech said...

Thinking about Steve's comments earlier, I recall my initial thought was that, you can distinguish between what the state does - and go to the registry office, the hotel de ville as the French do, for the civil transaction, and then go to the church for the blessing of the community of faith. But no - I have the leisure to draw that distinction, if I may, and choose such a course. Some folks can't.

John Leech said...

Disclaimer: I was, for awhile, marketing director for Polebridge Press & the Westar Institute, organizers of the Jesus Seminar meetings & publishers of the 4th R.